🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to overturn a lower court's block that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She stated that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Usually, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several additional conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic officials lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A top Democratic figure argued the court had once again damaged its credibility by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.